Anti-osteoporosis drugs: The evidence mounts that they do enormous harm

Here in New Zealand, celebrity "experts", like Jude Dobson, actively promote bisphoshonate drugs on national television for the prevention of osteoporosis.  I think these are the most awful drugs yet to be foisted on the unsuspecting public, principally senior women.

The results can be catastrophic such as the loss on one's jaw bone or the spontaneous fracture of both legs.  The result of leg fractures is more often death than not.

I have reproduced lawyer, Tom Law's latest newsletter in full.  Please visit his website for more information, including how to take legal action if you or a loved one have been harmed by one of these drugs.

Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures With Use Of Oral Bisphosphonates: Fosamax, Actonel, And Boniva

These Fractures Have Several Atypical Characteristics: Prodromal Symptoms, Occurence With Mimimal Trauma, Distinctive Radiographic Changes

(Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com)

Three new medical journal articles about bisphosphonate-related femur fractures came to our attention in early September 2012.

The first, "Seek and ye shall find - subtrochanteric stress fractures in patients on oral bisphosphonate therapy; an emerging problem", points out in the Introduction section of its Abstract: "This fracture is often preceded by pain and distinctive radiographic changes, and associated with a characteristic fracture pattern."

In more detail, from the Results section of this article from the Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, British Volume:

Results  11 fractures were found in 10 patients matching the inclusion criteria outlined. All were female, and taking bisphosphonates for a mean of 4.3 years. 5 of the 10 patients described prodromal symptoms, for an average of 7.8 months before fracture. Although all fractures were deemed low velocity, 5 of 11 were atraumatic. 3 patients have had bilateral subtrochanteric fractures. Presence of the distinctive radiological ‘bleb’ was common. Surveillance on 2 patients shows lateral cortical blebs on the contralateral femur which merit close follow up.

The second article is "Atypical subtrochanteric femoral shaft fractures: role for mechanics and bone quality.", from the August 29, 2012 edition of Arthritis Research & Therapy.  In part, the authors set forth some of the unique characteritics commonly found in atypical femoral fractures (AFF) in the subtrochanteric region or the diaphysis with patients using bisphosphonates such as Fosamax (alendronate), Actonel (risedronate), Boniva (ibandronate):

These fractures have several atypical characteristics, including occurrence with minimal trauma; younger age than typical osteoporotic fractures; occurrence at cortical, rather than cancellous sites; early radiographic appearance similar to that of a stress fracture; transverse fracture pattern rather than the familiar spiral or transverse-oblique morphologies; initiation on the lateral cortex; and high risk of fracture on the contralateral side, at the same location as the initial fracture.

The last article, "Spontaneous incomplete transverse subtrochanteric femoral fracture with cortical thickening possibly secondary to risedronate use: a case report.", from the Journal of Medical Case Reports, discusses an atypical femur fracture secondary to relatively short-term Actonel use:

We consider this case report not only interesting but also important and unusual because it is about a patient who developed a potentially rare and serious side effect of long-term bisphosphonate use, estimated to affect 2.3 in every 10,000 patients, and who presented with a pelvic X-ray that showed the characteristic features of atypical fractures secondary to [Actonel (risedronate)] use. In addition, most of the documented cases have been associated with many years of bisphosphonate use whereas our patient had been on risedronate for only four years.

We will continue to monitor the journals for developments in the medical literature concerning femur fractures associated with bisphosphonates such as Actonel, Boniva, and Fosamax.

______________________________________________________________________________

DrugInjuryLaw.com: Legal Information And News About Prescription Drug Side Effects

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Why haven't anti-osteoporosis drugs been taken off the market?

Fosamax Information

What is Fosamax?

Fosamax is Merck's popular osteoporosis drug, generically known as alendronate, which is part of a class of drugs known as bisphosphonates. Fosamax is used to treat osteoporosis and bone pain caused by some cancers. 

Fosamax use has been associated with atypical stress fractures, or insufficiency fractures, of the femur / thigh bone. While the medical articles about femur fractures in long-term users of Fosamax have been getting more attention recently, many prescribing and treating doctors have still not learned about this possible Fosamax side effect, yet.

Medical studies have also shown a possible link between using Fosamax and developing osteonecrosis of the jaw, or ONJ, which essentially is the destruction of bone tissue. Osteonecrosis of the jaw can be very painful and may lead to other complications such as infection, breakdown of the jawbone, ulcerations in the mouth, non-healing wounds, and osteomyelitis (inflammation of bone marrow).
http://www.druginjurylaw.com/Fosamax-information.php
________________________________
Gary:
Fosamax is just one of a class of drugs known as bisphosphonates.  These drugs work by killing off cells that remove old bone, thus giving a temporary gain in bone mass and a false sense of security.  Its a big lie.  The evidence is piling up that these drugs destroy healthy bone, increase fractures and make people very, very sick.

I have been following Tom Lamb of the US firm Drug Injury Law.
http://www.druginjurylaw.com/Fosamax-information.php
There are now close to 1,000 lawsuits pending against Fosamax alone!  You'd think these drugs would have been whisked off the market by now.  Instead, we see the opposite with television personalities, like NZ's Jude Dobson, seductively promoting these drugs on prime time television.

Why do these drugs continue to be aggressively marketed by doctors to unsuspecting patients?

I think I know what is going on.  These drugs are worth billions of dollars in world-wide sales.  It can take as long as ten years for a case to stumble its way through the courts and may, in the end, amount to a few millions in settlements.  This is chicken feed to the company when one looks at how many millions upon millions they will bring in by way of sales while the court cases grind on and on.

One other factor is that the plaintiffs are generally aged, unwell (the drugs ensure this!) and lacking financial resources.  Big Pharma counts on most of these people not having the stamina or the longevity to see a protracted and exhausting litigation through to finality.

Why do doctors continue to enthusiastically push these harmful drugs onto their trusting patients?

I can not understand why anybody who professes to be a health expert would ever associate with such harmful drugs, let alone profit from them.  I don't know.  You tell me!

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.