Gary Moller: [DipPhEd PGDipRehab PGDipSportMed(Otago)FCE Certified, Kordel's and Nutra-Life Certified Natural Health Consultant]. ICL Laboratories registered Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis and Medical Nutrition Consultant.

More than a thousand free articles with advice and commentary about health, fitness and medical matters.

Gary's new website

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Zealandia 'a bottomless pit'

The new $17 million interactive centre at Zealandia wildlife sanctuary has failed to attract enough visitors to make it financially viable in its first year.
ZEALANDIA: Bird haven or bottomless pit for council money?It is understood the Karori Sanctuary Trust board has talked to Wellington City Council about a range of options, including the possibility of up to $700,000 in extra funding.In the December quarter alone, the sanctuary had about 8000 fewer visitors than forecast.   Read more....
Wayne wrote after reading this article:  "Think what else you could have done with 17 million dollars that could have involved getting people exercising in the outdoors instead of fostering an indoor lifestyle making more problems for peoples health.  This just cuts down the time spent outdoors where they should be at the reserve, they could have spaced more information boards around the park for people to see as they walked around for a fraction of the price instead of more architectural BS".

The Zealandia Nature Reserve is located about 1km up the hill from our home.  Before it was turned into an enclosure, our family used the area every week for runs, walks and mountain biking.  When it was proposed to be converted into a bird sanctuary, we enthusiastically supported the project, including assisting the fund raising and lobbying of officials and politicians.  It was naively assumed by us that we would have access to the area once the fencing was complete in return for our voluntary efforts to get the project up and running - and for modest ongoing donations to help with its upkeep.  How wrong we were!

Helene Ritchie is right to say the Sanctuary should be free to Wellingtonians.  Instead, we get a flash building and entry fees that makes access unaffordable for most families.

While the sanctuary has been of unquestionable benefit to Wellington's bird life, I have been deeply disappointed with the way the costs have blown out, mostly on a pointless visitor's center that has alienated so many of the sanctuary's original supporters.  It is now a massive millstone around the neck of the sanctuary.

I have not been into the sanctuary because the project failed, almost from the very beginning, to adequately acknowledge the support of the thousands of people who contributed to the project when it was first proposed and in protest at the $17 million (and rising!) wasted on the visitors center.  Many times, during its construction, I ran past the visitor's center and observed how it was blowing out in cost - Massive engineering work to stabilise the hillside that it backs onto, for example.  I wondered constantly; "How on earth was all this construction work was going to benefit the birds?"

Instead of a visitor's center, I would have been happier with a simple shelter.  I am with Wayne on this one. With $17 million it would have been possible to extend the sanctuary into surrounding countryside.  Or it could have been spent on an even more ambitious project to turn the entire Terawhiti South Coast into a stunning Regional Park.

Now, that would get my support!

About this website
The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.  Please give me your support by subscribing to my free email updates. Please shop at my Online Store. Please encourage your family and friends to do the same. While we may not always be able to compete with the big operators on price, we aim to more than compensate through personal service!

Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz
Do you have a question?  Email Gary: Include any relevant background information to your question.  Please be patient and be aware that I may not be able to answer every inquiry in detail, depending on workloads (My paying clients take precedence!). I will either reply by email or, most likely, by way of an article (Personal identifying details will be removed before publication).
Post a Comment