If you decide to vaccinate your child here are some expert guidelines

Almost every parent has questions about childhood vaccines, but nobody can offer complete, authoritative, unbiased answers . . . until now. In The Vaccine Book, Dr. Bob Sears explores the childcare question of the decade, “Should you vaccinate your child?”

Vaccines have become the most controversial topic for parents and doctors today. Most of you want to vaccinate your children, but you also want to know about the risks and side effects of the shots. You don't just want to be told, “Vaccines are perfectly safe and none of the concerns you read about in the media and on the internet have been proven to be true.” You want, and deserve, a fair, scientific and straightforward discussion of the shots you are giving your child.

"If you choose to vaccinate, this book will answer your questions about how to proceed in the safest manner possible. Should you get all the shots together as they are recommended, or should you space them out a little bit? Are there one or two shots you might delay for now or skip altogether? "

http://www.askdrsears.com/topics/health-concerns/vaccines

About this website 

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation. Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Candida and Fungal Infections? Gary Moller recommends you explore this programme: Click Here!

The Flu Shot – Dr Oz is getting his, are you? I hope not!

Gary:  The following article is by a NZ Doctor (MD) with decades of experience in the health sector.  He has requested total anonymity.  On reading this you will understand that this Dr is breaking ranks: Contrary to what we hear in the media and from those in authority: The Seasonal Flu Vaccine Programme is a poor use of precious health dollars.  I totally agree.

"My main thrust, I guess, is that the Govt should be far more onto it than they are, and should be just as accountable as the drug companies for their actions. A terrible waste of tax payers' money." (Dr)

I have also linked an excellent article on the matter, at the end of this post, that supports what the doctor has written.  It includes some excellent advice about how to protect yourself, naturally, from the worst effects of seasonal flu.  

The first video is of Piers Morgan receiving the flu vaccine from Dr Oz.  The second, at the end of this post, is of him suffering from the flu 10 days later.



Note: I am not anti-vaccinations (I can't speak for the doctor, because I have not asked him).  There are some vaccines, such as the tetanus one, that I do not have a problem with.  I do have a problem with the hijacking of health by commercial interests that consign our immune systems to the back seat when it comes to protection from agents of disease. 

Here is the Good Doctor's article:

The Flu Shot – Dr Oz is getting his, are you?

The flue is heading our way and if the reports coming out of the USA are anything to go by, we could be thumped. 

 DR Oz tells us we need the flu shot and he will be getting his. None the less, with a widespread vaccination campaign and with our family doctors keeping us on our toes, we will be well prepared. As doctors, the word vaccination has us nodding our heads in appreciation for this wondrous gift, bestowed upon us to save our patients from serious illness and for those in poor health, even death. Our collective wisdom tells us that hard-working scientists, more elevated than we at the coal face, have done the hard yards and we need us only ask, when, where and how often. Besides, we know the Department of Health and Pharmac, ever vigilant with their spending, will know that a stitch in time saves nine.

A few weeks ago, an update to a medical Information program had an interview with an expert in disease control who stated that the vaccine works on average in 62% of those vaccinated, but in 2011, although no figure was given, it was less than 60%. The strike rate seemed a little poor to me and being one who likes to be honest with his patients ie, I am not comfortable telling them they need to have it when less than 60% might benefit, information related to the flu vaccine was worth a closer look.

Further to this, the frequently touted “the vaccination doesn't necessarily mean you won’t get the bug, but it won’t be as bad,” is also worthy of consideration. We all know it is the elderly, the ill and the very young that are most vulnerable to seasonal influenza.

A 2005 study reported in one of the world’s major medical journals, Archives of Internal Medicine stated that the influenza vaccination is not proven in younger individuals at risk (Arch Intern Med, 2005, 165(16):121-2). It was further stated in the same year, that despite an increasing vaccination coverage after 1980, there was no correlation with declining mortality rates in any age group. (Arch Intern Med.2005;165(3):265-72. In fact between 1967 and 2011, there have been no clinical trials evaluating the effects of the traditional flu vaccine in the elderly at all – the most highly targeted group (Lancet Infect Dis.2012;12(1):36-44) In considering the millions of dollars spent each year in NZ on the vaccination program, things looked a little flakey, which leads us to the Cochrane Collaboration.

The Cochrane Collaboration

The above organization is an international network of 28,000 dedicated people working together to help healthcare workers, policy makers, patients, their advocates and carers, make well informed decisions about health care. Their work is regarded as the benchmark for high quality information about the effectiveness of health care. The reviews they produce are unique because they are produced by and relevant to, everyone interested in the effects of human health care. This is where the rubber meets the road, it either helps us or it doesn't.

Their findings are mind boggling:-

Their study “Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults,” (Gary: I have reproduced the entire report at the end of this article) is damming of the entire pharmaceutical industry and its minions: the drug testing industry and the medical system that both relies on and promotes them. Some major findings were: 

“….industry funded studies were published in more prestigious journals and cited more often than other studies…”

“….reliable evidence on influenza vaccines is thin….”

“….there is evidence of widespread manipulation of conclusions….”

Even without taking into account the shoddiness of the studies in general, the authors were still hard put to find any benefit of any sort in healthy people. At best, they found a small decrease in the number of days off work. They did not find that the vaccinations had any benefit whatsoever in complications or mortality. From the science point of view, the reviews of Chochrane are as good as it gets - and the pharmaceutical industry, yes the fox has been well and truly in charge of the hen house.

The revenue from the flu vaccine to the pharmaceutical industry is reputed to be 3.6 billion $USD a year. Even in NZ, at a cost of around $20 a dose, millions of dollars are involved. The question that must be asked – in a country where health dollars are hard to come by, as to why are Pharmac and the NZ Department of Health, are not up with the play? Evidence based research is at the core of sound medical decision making, however, in the case of the pharmaceutical companies; we know that he who pays the piper calls the tune. A recent article (Mercola.com), stated that the cradle to the grave vaccination policy of the US Centre’s for Disease Control has become so entrenched ,that the CDC – the organization that set the policy, can quietly acknowledge that any benefit is minimal, which was stated in a round- about way in one of their recent bulletins (www.cdc.gov/flu/about/us_flu-related_deaths).

We hope that Dr Oz, with his powerful media position, at least gets his jab at no cost.

Vaccines for preventing influenza in healthy adults

Does having a flu shot mean I won't get the flu?

http://www.foodmatters.tv/articles-1/does-having-a-flu-shot-mean-i-wont-get-the-flu

About this website 

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation. Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Infants are more likely suffer adverse events the more vaccinations received

Sensational!  Read this.....

"Our findings show a positive correlation between the number of vaccine doses administered and the percentage of hospitalizations and deaths. Since vaccines are given to millions of infants annually, it is imperative that health authorities have scientific data from synergistic toxicity studies on all combinations of vaccines that infants might receive. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety should be the highest priority."
GS Goldman1 and NZ Miller
Relative trends in hospitalizations and mortality among infants by thenumber of vaccine doses and age, based on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS),1990–2010 ________________________
Gary:
I have the following points to make:

• Less than 1% of adverse medical events ever get onto an official database.  Under-reporting is discussed in this study of vaccine safety.  It is a serious safety issue because, without accurate reporting, unsafe medical procedures, such as dispensing multiple vaccines to tiny infants, will continue unabated.
• Adverse reactions to a medical procedure, including vaccination, may not be noted or happen for days, weeks or even months following the procedure.  In many cases, such as with autism, the connection may never be made by the parents and there may even be outright denial of a connection by the medical professionals involved, or their colleagues (this is called "closing of ranks").
• While there have been studies to show the safety of single type of vaccines, there is no requirement to demonstrate the safety of administering multiple vaccines all at once, or in combination with other medications.  This is a situation that is inherently dangerous.

Further reading, including how best to safeguard your infant child

Your child's health is everything.  Here are a dozen articles I have written on the subject of vaccinations, including advice for parents who are agonising over how to deal with this vexatious issue.
http://blog.garymoller.com/search/label/vaccination

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Autism linked to fever or flu in pregnancy - An explanation why this may be the case

Children are more likely to have autism if their mothers had the flu or a prolonged fever during the first or second trimester of pregnancy.

"The data indicates that maternal flu infection or an extended fever increases the risk for autism in the offspring — a twofold increase," said Paul H. Patterson, a biology professor who researches the connections between infection and neurological development at the California Institute of Technology.

Read the full article here:
http://www.mnn.com/health/fitness-well-being/stories/autism-linked-to-fever-or-flu-in-pregnancy
___________________________
Gary:

Here is the key to why the women in the study appear more likely to have an autistic child...

When I refer to my text books, there is a link between zinc deficiency and autism.  Wow - switch on a light folks!

Zinc deficiency is the norm in New Zealand, including sheep and cattle (think of facial eczema).  In over a thousand tests I can not recall more than one or two people with high zinc levels.  Children are consistently among the lowest.

Zinc deficiency makes a person extremely vulnerable to viral and fungal infections (think of warts, colds, hooping cough, flu, candida, Epstein-Barr, chronic fatigue syndrome).

Things that deplete zinc in the body:

• Heavy metals such as mercury and lead
• Viral infections such as flu or past glandular fever
• Oestrogen based contraceptives including copper IUDs
• Tissue injury of any kind, including hard or prolonged exercise

If a woman has any combination of the above, leading into or during pregnancy, she may be at greater risk than the norm of having a child that is severely low in zinc (not to mention a whole lot else!). Her baby may be on the tipping point of falling into a state of severe zinc depletion.  The brain can not develop normally if there is not sufficient zinc in relation to other mineral, particularly copper.

That being the case, even a mild viral infection or even the tiniest amount of toxin like mercury introduced into the body of the tiny babe may be all that is required to bring about the tipping point into neurological disaster!

This explains very nicely why an apparently normal, healthy baby may rapidly withdraw into an autistic state within days or months following a fever or vaccination.

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Vaccines containing mercury preservatives may be good for children's brains

" CBS K-EYE Medical Watch with Seema Mathur describes how two studies in the Journal of Pediatrics suggest that vaccines containing mercury preservatives "may actually be associated with improved behavior and mental performance." Following is microscopic footage from the University of Calgary depicting How Mercury Causes Brain Neuron Degeneration."

Gary:
Research claims that mercury which is found in childhood vaccines actually improves behaviour and mental performance beggars belief!    The fact is that mercury is a powerful neurotoxin that is not safe at any level.   It is the last thing that anybody, especially an infant or child needs.

Research like this makes a mockery of science

Please take a few minutes to view the video below which shows exactly the damage that the tiniest amount of mercury wreaks on the nerves:

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

Study finds that Flu vaccine recipients found to be more likely to get the flu

Part of the complex process of
acquiring immunity.

A strange vaccine-related phenomenon spotted in Canada at the start of the 2009 flu pandemic may well have been real, a new study suggests.

Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot.

Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results. But initially research outside Canada did not, and the effect was dismissed as a "Canadian problem," a problem with the flu vaccine used in Canada.

But a new study suggests the findings were real.

Skowronski and a group of researchers have recreated the event in ferrets. Their findings were presented Sun-day at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, a major international infectious diseases conference taking place in San Francisco.

Skowronski, who outlined the work at a webcast press conference, worked with 32 ferrets, giving half the 2008 seasonal flu shot and the rest a placebo injection. The work was blinded, meaning the researchers didn't know which ferrets received which shot. Later, all the ferrets were infected with the pandemic H1N1 virus.

The ferrets in the vaccine group became significantly sicker than the other animals, though all recovered.

"The findings are consistent with the increased risk that we saw in the human studies," Skowronski said.

The reason is unclear and Skowronski urged other research groups to take up the question. She said it's important to get to the root before the next pandemic. But in the meantime, Skow-ronski insisted the findings should not deter people from getting flu shots.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver 

_____________________________________Gary:
I find this last piece of advice rather interesting:

"Skow-ronski insisted the findings should not deter people from getting flu shots."

I conclude that we should be very cautious about relying on flu vaccines for protection against flu epidemics.  What this research further tells me is we should be concentrating our public health promotion efforts on ensuring that populations have much robust natural immune systems, rather than relying on unreliable technology to protect us from bugs like the flu.  In coming to these conclusions, we must also bear in mind that

"One swallow does not make a Summer"

This is just one study, so we should not jump to conclusions.  At the same time, my impression is that there is a growing body of evidence that vaccines are not the harmless panacea that they are usually made out to be. Watch this space!

We have evolved over millions of years to coexist with bugs of every kind imaginable.  Most of these bugs do us no harm, or when we catch them, the healthy Human will, in most cases, shrug off the infection in about 10 days after which there will be the best part of lifelong immunity or resistance to it - and resistance to future variants.

Where bugs do the most harm is when a person's immune system is weak.  This is very common nowadays due to nutrient-compromised foods, widespread environmental toxins, drugs/medicines and an ageing population that previously would have been thinned out from famine, industrial accidents, child birth and war.  And infection from poor sanitation (mostly eliminated nowadays).

Why do vaccines appear to give only partial, temporary immunity?

A good example is the tetanus vaccine which requires regular booster shots.  Or the Gardisil vaccine for Herpes which may require successive shots to ensure a reasonable immunity.

If you want to learn more about how we acquire immunity, please read this online lecture on the topic:
http://www.uic.edu/classes/bios/bios100/lecturesf04am/lect23.htm

In a nutshell, what may be happening is the weak vaccine-initiated immune response is too weak to shunt the immune process through all stages of acquiring powerful and lasting immunity.  It fizzes out partway, leaving the person vulnerable to future infection.

Here are a number of things you can do for yourself and your family to ensure your immune system is in good condition:

• Ensure your diet is rich in betacarotene, vitamins and minerals, especially vitamin C, zinc and magnesium (A Hair Tissue Mineral Analysis takes out the guessing).  This is most essential during puberty, pregnancy, periods of illness, stress and when on medication.  For example, when a girl goes through puberty her zinc requirements soar, rendering her extremely vulnerable to severe viral, fungal and yeast infections - if she is zinc deficient (most are!).  
• Get a little daily natural vitamin D from supplements or from the sun.  Avoid, at all costs, medical megadoses of synthetic vitamin D!  A dribble of about 1,000iu of natural D per day is about right.
• Avoid toxins that weaken the immune system.  Toxins include most medicines, excessive alcohol, food additives, environmental pollutants such as exhaust fumes and even many cosmetics.
• Get rid of or mitigate unnecessary stress.  Excessive and constant stress smashes and  confuses the immune system.
• Get regular sleep.  Be in bed and asleep by 10am and awake by 7am.  Children need more sleep.
• Get regular but not exhausting exercise.  Preferably outdoors.  It should leave you invigorated - not wasted.
• Here's a radical suggestion:  Expose yourself to dirt, colds and flus when you are in excellent health.    Sure, you might end up off work for a few days; but you'll shrug it off within 10 days and then have immunity for life.  In the case of flu each one contracted naturally primes your immune system against future variations.  Complete avoidance may leave your immune system more vulnerable for the really nasty variant should one end up doing the rounds!  
• Wash your hands, but go easy on the antibacterial wipes and sprays.

I am definitely not anti-vaccination

Vaccines do have their place, such as for protection against the really nasty of the nasty bugs, such as tetanus.  What I do have a serious problem with is the vast vaccine industry that is fueled by massive profits.  This industry knows no limits.  There are millions of bugs out there and if this this industry and those that profit from it, had their way they would have us taking a vaccine for protection against every single one!  Or so this would appear to be the motivation.  Of course, this is sheer fantasy but I think we have already gone too far down this track.

Its not a surprise that all the fear-mongering about the flu and other bugs does not include sensible advice about how to strengthen you and your family's immune health.  Your immune system is your first and most powerful line of defense against ALL infections!  Why is it not a surprise it is largely ignored?

Because there's no money in it!

We have to draw the line somewhere because we can't vaccinate against anything and  there is the possibility that too many vaccines may end up actually weakening and confusing the immune system.  So, I advocate vaccination against bugs like tetanus but not against the flu.  Instead, I advocate simple and effective nutrition and lifestyle strategies to bolster one's natural defenses against these lesser bugs.

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

I think the link between vaccines with autism and death may be severe zinc deficiency

High Zn (zinc) especially in the presence of low
Mo (molybdenum) on the Hair Tissue Mineral
Analysis indicates zinc loss and therefore likely to
be a deficiency.

I think the link between vaccines with autism and death may be severe zinc deficiency.  Zinc deficiency is rife in modern times.  This is because modern foods such as the instant noodle - in fact,  all processed foods - are seriously deficient in zinc along with co-factors such as piridoxine.  Zinc is critical for the body's resistance against viral infections, no matter the source.

Today's generation: The "In Generation"  

(The "Instant Noodle" Generation)

Please take time to read this interesting article about the growing evidence of the link between vaccines, viruses, autism and death (thanks for the article, Lorraine):

Unveiling the Culprit
Is Foreign DNA Contamination the Autistic Villain behind Biologic Vaccine Injuries?
September 2, 2012 By Leslie Carol Botha

http://holyhormones.com/womens-health/cancer-womens-health/cervical-cancer/unveiling-the-culprit-is-foreign-dna-contamination-the-autistic-villain-behind-biologic-vaccine-injuries/

By Leslie Carol Botha
Women’s Health Freedom Coalition Coordinator
Natural Solutions Foundation
September 2, 2012

Foreign DNA is a term most medical consumers are not aware of. However, common sense alone raises questions about the dangers of foreign DNA – otherwise known as recombinant DNA. The American Biologic Safety Association (ABSA) has classified recombinant DNA a biohazard and has outlined specific directives over the handling of such contaminants.1.

According to a supporting document, written by the Coalition of Vaccine Safety “…The presence of dormant and relict viral sequences in the human and other animal genomes has been known for at least 20 years.These include human retroviral sequences that have been identified in live viral vaccines grown in human cells. 2.

“Victoria and colleagues have identified the contamination of live viral vaccines for use in healthy children, with viral nucleic acids; the findings have since been confirmed by the vaccine manufacturers and the data reported to the FDA. Contaminating nucleic acids include retroviral sequences from the producer chicken and primate cells. Specifically, Avian leucosis virus (ALV) was present as RNA in viral particles while simian retrovirus (SRV) was present as genetically defective DNA. Rotarix, an orally administered rotavirus vaccine, contained nucleic acids from porcine circovirus-1 (PCV1), virus. Since this report, a second rotavirus vaccine (RotaTeq) has been shown to contain nucleic acids from both PCV1 and PCV2, a pathogen in pigs that is associated with wasting and immunodeficiency. The circumstances in which PCV2 induces disease are discussed below.“3.

The Center for the Biology of Chronic Disease (CBCD),* publisher of Dr. Hanan Polansky’s the Purple book Microcompetition with Foreign DNA and the Origin of Chronic Disease explains how foreign DNA fragments can cause many major diseases without damaging (mutating) the human DNA. The book has been read by more than 5,000 scientists around the world, and has been reviewed in more than 20 leading scientific journals. The theory explains the underlying cause of many major diseases and shows how dormant viruses actually can cause disease while still latent.

Dr. Polansky discovered that foreign DNA fragments called N-boxes can cause disease. When these foreign DNA fragments enter the body (naturally, or artificially, like through an injection of a vaccine or other treatments), they end up in the cell’s nucleus, where they attract scarce genetic resources. The “microcompetition” between the foreign N-boxes and the human N-boxes cause the human genes to malfunction, which, in turn, can lead to disease.

In fact, when approached about the HPV rDNA contamination found in Gardasil® – Dr. Polansky agreed that the contaminant should not be there. According to Polansky – the potentially harmful contaminant is part of the faulty biologic medicine manufacturing process that is unable to filter out all foreign DNA plasmids and therefore the particles were suspected to be present in all biologic medicines on the market.

Is the Autism Epidemic Linked to Foreign DNA Particles in the MMR II Vaccine?

In April of this year, the CBCD published a press release4. encouraging the CDC to study Polansky’s Microcompetition Theory since foreign DNA has also been found in Merck & Co.’s MMR II vaccine.5. The vaccine package insert (available for download at the FDA’s web site) shows that fetal cell line Wistar RA 27/3, fetal cell line WI-38, and genetically engineered human albumin are all used in the vaccine.

The CBCD believes that a better understanding of the theory – lauded by many scientists and researchers at NIH, and other esteemed universities and organizations may lead to better policies to curb the Autism epidemic. In a recent CDC report that epidemic has increased by 78% since 2007.

Infants 12 months of age or older, are inoculated with the MMR II vaccine with a second dose usually given around age four or five right before entry to school. According to the CBCD, this is also usually the time that the majority of Autism diagnoses are made.

The release goes on to state:

The CBCD believes that the current purification processes cannot completely filter all foreign DNA plasmids used in the process of manufacturing the MMR II vaccine. Therefore, some foreign DNA fragments end up being injected into infants.
“The MMR II vaccine is contaminated with human DNA from the cell line in which the rubella virus is grown. This human DNA could be the cause of the spikes in incidence. An additional increased spike in incidence of autism occurred in 1995 when the chicken pox vaccine was grown in human fetal tissue,” wrote Dr. Helen Ratajczak, Ph.D. in support of this belief. She published two papers regarding this subject in the Journal of Immunotoxicology. (Merck and Co. Inc., 2001; Breuer, 2003)
However, it appears that the CDC and FDA are aware of the problem with vaccines. In June of 2001, a paper was published in Emerging Infectious Diseases entitled: “Adventitious Agents and Vaccines” stating that:
“Many novel vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, and emerging infectious diseases may theoretically be transmitted from animals to humans through these vaccines. The challenge of identifying potential adventitious agents in vaccines closely parallels the challenge of identifying the agents causing particular emerging infectious diseases.” 6.

Dormant HPV Infections the Silent Culprit

Although the FDA asserts that the foreign DNA fragments found in Gardasil® poses no risk, the CBCD disagrees. Their research has led them to believe that HPV has the ability to establish a chronic, dormant (latent) infection and it those chronic infections that can potentially lead to cancer.

A recent study entitled “Prevalence of Oral HPV Infection in the United States, 2009 – 2010” that was published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) reported that the HPV virus was found in the mouths of 7% of study participants. 5,600 people participated in the study. Oral HPV was found in men more than in women.

The authors of the study wrote, ‘The prevalence of oral HPV infection among men and women aged 14 to 69 years in the United States is approximately 7%… Infection with HPV-16, (a specific type of HPV most associated with cancer) was detected in 1% of men and women, corresponding to an estimated 2.13 million infected individuals in the United States.’

In essence, according to the study, 2.13 million people who don’t have symptoms now, and don’t even know they are infected, could develop cancer due to their HPV infection. 7.

Now add in the rDNA factor and one has to wonder at the mechanisms of action that are actually going on in the body. Dormant DNA – potentially becoming stimulated by the vaccine designed to prevent the chronic infection leading to cervical and other HPV-related cancers – with a mix of rDNA bound to aluminum now circulating in the blood and targeting the weakened areas of the body.

HPV rDNA Particles found in Postmortem Inquest of New Zealand Girl

In August, Dr Sin Hang Lee, a pathologist on the medical staff at Connecticut’s Milford Hospital testified about the discovery of HPV DNA fragments in post-mortem samples of her blood and spleen 6 months after Gardasil®® vaccination at the postmortem inquest of Jasmine Renata, a New Zealand teenager who died in her sleep.8.

Dr. Lee’s testimony stated:

“The finding of these foreign DNA fragments in the post-mortem samples six months after vaccination indicates that some of the residual DNA fragments from the viral gene or plasmid injected with Gardasil® have been protected from degradation in the form of DNA-aluminum complexes in the macrophages; or via integration into the human genome.
Undegraded viral and plasmid DNA fragments are known to activate macrophages, causing them to release tumor necrosis factor, a myocardial depressant which can induce lethal shock in animals and humans.”

Although Dr. Lee’s discovery cannot directly tie the rDNA to the girl’s death, the probable mechanism of action does exist since all other ‘cause of death’ scenarios have been ruled out.

According to Dr. Lee, Gardasil® contains a genetically engineered recombinant HPV DNA inserted into yeast cells. rDNA behaves differently than natural HPV DNA which does not stay in the blood stream for a long period of time.

Once a segment of recombinant DNA is inserted into a human cell, the consequences are hard to predict. It may be in the cell temporarily or stay there forever, with or without causing a mutation. Now the host cell contains human DNA as well as genetically engineered viral DNA. 9.

War of the DNA

The most frightening aspect of all is that government health agencies do not have the testing nor do they have understanding as to what happens when a recombinant DNA particle infects a cell with ‘normal’ DNA.

What are the mechanisms of action that determine who wins the DNA wars? What if the normal ‘DNA’ loses? Are the skyrocketing rates of autism and the increasing Post-Gardasil and Post-Cervarix Syndromes examples of DNA gone bad?

Even more frightening is that scientists do not know how to isolate or even remove the foreign DNA particles from the body. What lies ahead is a crap shoot for medical consumers who are left with a ‘damned if I do or damned if I don’t scenario.’

—————————————–

Source

1. Risk Classification Criteria for World Health Organization, Australia, Canada, European Union (EU), USA CDC/NIH and NIH for RDNA.
2. Biohazard potential for live viral vaccines containing naked or free nucleic acids from contaminating (adventitious) viruses.
3. Viral nucleic acids in live-attenuated vaccines: detection of 1 minority variants and an adventitious virus
4. Autism Epidemic, Is Foreign DNA in MMR II Vaccine Responsible? CBCD Suggests CDC Study Microcompetition Theory
5. Merck & Co. Product Package Insert on MMR II vaccine
6. Emerging Infectious Diseases, Adventitious Agents and Vaccines,
7. Dormant HPV Infections Can Cause Disease Even Without Activating
8. Gardasil® HPV DNA Discovered in Post-Mortem Blood and Spleen Tissue
9. Discovery of Potential Bio-hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil® HPV 4 Vaccine

_______________________________________

About this website

The advice in these articles is given freely without promise or obligation.  Its all about giving you and your family the tools and information to take control of your health and fitness.

The Vaccine Debate: Report of the Health Select Committee's Inquiry into "How to improve immunisation completion rates" in New Zealand

Gary:

Before you read the letter that follows, you might like to read these articles listed here that outline my views on the issues surrounding vaccinations.

http://blog.garymoller.com/search/label/vaccination

While I may be opposed to giving otherwise healthy children the Flu vaccine, I am in favour of giving them a tetanus vaccine - but not to an infant, that's for sure!

The vaccine debate has polarised into two opposing camps - those vehemently pro-vaccine and those who are equally vehemently opposed.  There is no middle ground left.  Both of these opposing sides are wrong as far as I am concerned.

Both camps are far too emotionally involved and entrenched to be able to make the right decisions - Decisions that are in the best interests of the children.

I feel for the tens of thousands of parents who are the confused meat in the sandwich of this fight and who may end up with no choice at the end of the day, other than compulsory vaccination for just about every bug under the sun.

_____________________________________________

Katherine Smith, editor 

The New Zealand Journal of Natural Medicine 

PO Box 44-128 

Point Chevalier 

Auckland 1246 

Dear Friends, 

On March 24, 2011, the Report of the Health Select Committee's Inquiry into "How to improve [increase] immunisation [vaccination] completion  rates" in New Zealand which was published on the parliamentary website. The government has 90 days (from March 24) to respond to the report. The government's response to this report is due on June 22.  

The Health Select Committee (under the leadership of Dr Paul Hutchison) has produced a report that recommends raising the targeted vaccination completion rate to 95% for NZ children aged 0-4.  It also proposes a target be set for 11 year olds. 

The report also recommends that the government make children's enrollment at school and early childhood centres dependent on parents producing proof of their children's vaccination status and – even more ominously – suggests that government direct the Ministry of Health to consider linking "existing parental benefits" to vaccination. (See Page 6 of the Report.) 

If the government accepts the recommendations in the report, it appears that parents will be forced to choose whether their child has no vaccinations – or all vaccinations on the schedule – in order to be able to supply the documentation necessary to enroll their child in a school or early childhood education centre.  Eligibility for the 20 Hours Free Early Childhood Education may also be restricted to children who have had all recommended vaccinations (or whose parents have decided against vaccination) according to Page 33 of the Report.  Christians (and others) who decide against MMR vaccination because of the use of cells derived from aborted foetal tissue in its production* (or for any other reason) could be particularly badly affected if the government  adopts these sort of discriminatory policies. 

Clear Conflict of Interest